https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_13
Journal: English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa, 2018, p.279-299
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Author: Zulfiqar Ahmad
List of references
- Banerjee, J., Franceschina, F., & Smith, A. M. (2007). Documenting features of written language production typical at different IELTS band score levels. IELTS Research Reports, Vol 7. IELTS Australia, Canberra and British Council, London.
- Baume, D., & Baume, C. (1996). Running tutorials and seminars training materials for research students. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford Brookes.
- Becker, A. (2011). Examining rubrics used to measure writing performance in US intensive English programs. The CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 113–130.
- Birrell, B. (2006). Implications of low English standards among overseas students at Australian universities. People and Place, 14(4), 53–64.
- Breland, H. M., Kubota, M. Y., & Bonner, M. W. (1999). The performance assessment study in writing: Analysis of the SAT II: Writing subject test (College Board Report No. 99-4). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1999.tb01822.x
- Bretag, T. (2007). The Emperor’s new clothes: Yes, there is a link between English language competence and academic standards. People & Place, 15(1), 13–21.
- Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524803
- Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
- Carrell, P. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 479–488.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3586466
- Chala, P. A., & Chapetón, C. M. (2012). EFL argumentative essay writing as a situated-social practice: A review of concepts. Folios, 36, 23–36.
https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.36folios23.36
- Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Turner, C. E. (2000). What to look for in ESL admission tests: Cambridge certificate exams, IELTS, and TOEFL. System, 28, 523–539.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00036-1
- Connor, U. (1987). Argumentative patterns in student essays: Cross-cultural differences. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 57–72). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 67–87.
https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199015501
- Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x .
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x
- Cumming, A. (2001). The difficulty of standards, for example in second language writing. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 209–229). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Cumming, A., & Mellow, J. D. (1996). An investigation into the validity of written indicators of second language proficiency. In A. Cumming & R. Berwick (Eds.), Validation in language testing (pp. 72–93). Clevedon and London: Multilingual Matters and Avon.
- Educational Testing Service. (2008). Reliability and comparability of TOEFL® iBT Scores. Princeton, NJ: Author.
- Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional grammar. London: Printer.
- Elbow, P. (1996). Writing assessment in the 21st century: A utopian view. In L. Bloom, D. Daiker, & E. White (Eds.), Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change (pp. 83–100). Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Frase, L., Faletti, J., Ginther, A., & Grant, L. (1999). Computer analysis of the TOEFL test of written English (TOEFL Research Report 64). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. New York: Longman.
- Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21, 66–78.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105
- Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927
- Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
- Jenkins, S., Jordan, M. K., & Weilland, P. O. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90027-L
- Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts, and world Englishes. New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891346
- Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
- Kaplan, R. (1984). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. In S. McKay (Ed.), Composing in a second language (pp. 43–62). New York: Harper & Row.
- Kennedy, C., & Thorp, D. (2002). A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
- Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing. London: Routledge.
- Maimon, E. P., Peritz, J. H., & Yancey, K. B. (2007). A writer’s resource: A handbook for writing and research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
- Martin, J. R. (2001). Language, register and genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 149–166). London: Routledge, Macquarie University, and The Open University.
- Mayor, B., Hewings, A., North, S., Swann, J., & Coffin, C. (1999). A Linguistic analysis of Chinese and Greek L1 scripts for IELTS Academic Writing Task 2. In L. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds.), IELTS collected papers: Research in speaking and writing assessment—Studies in language testing (Vol. 19, pp. 250–315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mickan, P., Slater, S., & Gibson, C. (2000). Study of response validity of the IELTS Writing Subtest. In R. Tulloh (Ed.), IELTS research reports (Vol. 3, pp. 29–48). Canberra: IELTS Australia.
- Mohamed, A. H., & Omer, M. R. (2000). Texture and culture: Cohesion as a marker of rhetorical organization in Arabic and English narrative texts. RELC Journal, 31(2), 45–75.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820003100203
- Németh, N., & Kormos, J. (2001). Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: The case of argumentation. Language Teaching Research, 5, 213–240.
https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500303
- Nichols, S. N., & Berliner, D. C. (2005). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high-stakes testing. Tempe, AZ: College of Education. Education Policy Studies Laboratory Report EPSL-0503-101-EPRU. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508483.pdf .
- Nicol, D. (2009). Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. The Quality Assurance Agency, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/publications/transforming-assessment-and-feedback.pdf?sfvrsn=12 .
- Purdue University Online Writing Lab. (2007). Organizing your argument. Retrieved October 2007, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/03/ .
- Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38, 444–456.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001
- Rose, M. (1984). Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tankó, G., & Tamási, G. (2008). A comprehensive taxonomy of argumentative thesis statements: A preliminary pilot study. Working Papers in Language Pedagogy, 2, 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.61425/wplp.2008.02.1.17
- Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
- Troyka, L. Q. (2004). Quick access: Reference for writers (2nd ed.). Toronto: Pearson.
- Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Veerapan, V., & Sulaiman, T. (2012). Theory and practice in language studies. Academy Publisher, 2(1), 138–143.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
- Weigle, S. C. (2006). Investing in assessment: Designing tests to promote positive washback. In P. Matsuda, C. Ortmeier-Hooper, & X. You (Eds.), Politics of second language writing: In search of the promised land (pp. 222–244). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
- Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 29–48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004
Publications that cite this publication
Summative Assessment, Test Scores and Text Quality: A Study of Cohesion as an Unspecified Descriptor in the Assessment Scale
Zulfiqar Ahmad
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.523 ·
2020, European Journal of Educational Research, №volume-9-issue-2-april-2020, p.523-535
Scopus
Crossref citations:3
Find all citations of the publication
About this publication
Number of citations | 1 |
Number of works in the list of references | 52 |
Journal indexed in Scopus | Yes |
Journal indexed in Web of Science | No |