Analyzing Argumentative Essay as an Academic Genre on Assessment Framework of IELTS and TOEFL (2024)

1. Banerjee, J., Franceschina, F., & Smith, A. M. (2007). Documenting features of written language production typical at different IELTS band score levels. IELTS Research Reports, Vol 7. IELTS Australia, Canberra and British Council, London.
2. Baume, D., & Baume, C. (1996). Running tutorials and seminars training materials for research students. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford Brookes.
3. Becker, A. (2011). Examining rubrics used to measure writing performance in US intensive English programs. The CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 113–130.
4. Birrell, B. (2006). Implications of low English standards among overseas students at Australian universities. People and Place, 14(4), 53–64.
5. Breland, H. M., Kubota, M. Y., & Bonner, M. W. (1999). The performance assessment study in writing: Analysis of the SAT II: Writing subject test (College Board Report No. 99-4). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
   https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1999.tb01822.x
6. Bretag, T. (2007). The Emperor’s new clothes: Yes, there is a link between English language competence and academic standards. People & Place, 15(1), 13–21.
7. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524803
8. Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
9. Carrell, P. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 479–488.
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3586466
10. Chala, P. A., & Chapetón, C. M. (2012). EFL argumentative essay writing as a situated-social practice: A review of concepts. Folios, 36, 23–36.
    https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.36folios23.36
11. Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Turner, C. E. (2000). What to look for in ESL admission tests: Cambridge certificate exams, IELTS, and TOEFL. System, 28, 523–539.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00036-1
12. Connor, U. (1987). Argumentative patterns in student essays: Cross-cultural differences. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 57–72). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 67–87.
    https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199015501
14. Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x .
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x
15. Cumming, A. (2001). The difficulty of standards, for example in second language writing. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 209–229). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cumming, A., & Mellow, J. D. (1996). An investigation into the validity of written indicators of second language proficiency. In A. Cumming & R. Berwick (Eds.), Validation in language testing (pp. 72–93). Clevedon and London: Multilingual Matters and Avon.
17. Educational Testing Service. (2008). Reliability and comparability of TOEFL® iBT Scores. Princeton, NJ: Author.
18. Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional grammar. London: Printer.
19. Elbow, P. (1996). Writing assessment in the 21st century: A utopian view. In L. Bloom, D. Daiker, & E. White (Eds.), Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change (pp. 83–100). Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
20. Frase, L., Faletti, J., Ginther, A., & Grant, L. (1999). Computer analysis of the TOEFL test of written English (TOEFL Research Report 64). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
21. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. New York: Longman.
22. Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21, 66–78.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105
23. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927
24. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
25. Jenkins, S., Jordan, M. K., & Weilland, P. O. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90027-L
26. Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts, and world Englishes. New York: Routledge.
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891346
27. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
28. Kaplan, R. (1984). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. In S. McKay (Ed.), Composing in a second language (pp. 43–62). New York: Harper & Row.
29. Kennedy, C., & Thorp, D. (2002). A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
30. Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing. London: Routledge.
31. Maimon, E. P., Peritz, J. H., & Yancey, K. B. (2007). A writer’s resource: A handbook for writing and research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
32. Martin, J. R. (2001). Language, register and genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 149–166). London: Routledge, Macquarie University, and The Open University.
33. Mayor, B., Hewings, A., North, S., Swann, J., & Coffin, C. (1999). A Linguistic analysis of Chinese and Greek L1 scripts for IELTS Academic Writing Task 2. In L. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds.), IELTS collected papers: Research in speaking and writing assessment—Studies in language testing (Vol. 19, pp. 250–315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Mickan, P., Slater, S., & Gibson, C. (2000). Study of response validity of the IELTS Writing Subtest. In R. Tulloh (Ed.), IELTS research reports (Vol. 3, pp. 29–48). Canberra: IELTS Australia.
35. Mohamed, A. H., & Omer, M. R. (2000). Texture and culture: Cohesion as a marker of rhetorical organization in Arabic and English narrative texts. RELC Journal, 31(2), 45–75.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820003100203
36. Németh, N., & Kormos, J. (2001). Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: The case of argumentation. Language Teaching Research, 5, 213–240.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500303
37. Nichols, S. N., & Berliner, D. C. (2005). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high-stakes testing. Tempe, AZ: College of Education. Education Policy Studies Laboratory Report EPSL-0503-101-EPRU. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508483.pdf .
38. Nicol, D. (2009). Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. The Quality Assurance Agency, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/publications/transforming-assessment-and-feedback.pdf?sfvrsn=12 .
39. Purdue University Online Writing Lab. (2007). Organizing your argument. Retrieved October 2007, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/03/ .
40. Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38, 444–456.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
41. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001
42. Rose, M. (1984). Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
43. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Tankó, G., & Tamási, G. (2008). A comprehensive taxonomy of argumentative thesis statements: A preliminary pilot study. Working Papers in Language Pedagogy, 2, 1–17.
    https://doi.org/10.61425/wplp.2008.02.1.17
45. Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
46. Troyka, L. Q. (2004). Quick access: Reference for writers (2nd ed.). Toronto: Pearson.
47. Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Veerapan, V., & Sulaiman, T. (2012). Theory and practice in language studies. Academy Publisher, 2(1), 138–143.
49. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
51. Weigle, S. C. (2006). Investing in assessment: Designing tests to promote positive washback. In P. Matsuda, C. Ortmeier-Hooper, & X. You (Eds.), Politics of second language writing: In search of the promised land (pp. 222–244). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
52. Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 29–48.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004

Summative Assessment, Test Scores and Text Quality: A Study of Cohesion as an Unspecified Descriptor in the Assessment Scale

Zulfiqar Ahmad

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.523 ·

About this publication