Using games to understand the mind (2024)

References

  1. Newell, A. et al. Human Problem Solving Vol. 104 (Prentice-Hall, 1972).

  2. Gobet, F., de Voogt, A. & Retschitzki, J. Moves in Mind: The Psychology of Board Games (Psychology Press. 2004).

  3. Gough, C. Number of gamers worldwide 2021. Statista 13, 2020 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  4. Suchow, J. W., Griffiths, T. & Hartshorne, J. K. Workshop on scaling cognitive science. Cognitive Science Society, https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/cogsci20a-W6-doc.pdf (2020).

  5. Brändle, F., Allen, K. R., Tenenbaum, J. & Schulz, E. Using games to understand intelligence. Proc. Ann. Meeting Cogn. Sci. Soc. 43, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/17z2q92d (2021).

  6. DePaulis, T. Board games before Ur? Board Game Stud. J. 14, 127–144 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  7. Greitemeyer, T. & Mügge, D. O. Video games do affect social outcomes: a meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 578–589 (2014).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bertram, L. Digital learning games for mathematics and computer science education: the need for preregistered RCTs, standardized methodology, and advanced technology. Front. Psychol. 11, 2127 (2020).

  9. Manzano-León, A. et al. Between level up and game over: a systematic literature review of gamification in education. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042247 (2021).

  10. Fleming, T. M. et al. Serious games and gamification for mental health: current status and promising directions. Front. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00215 (2017).

  11. Arjoranta, J. How to define games and why we need to. Comput. Games J. 8, 109–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  12. Stenros, J. The game definition game: a review. Games Cult. 12, 499–520 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  13. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations: The German Text, with an English Translation by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte 4th edn (Blackwell, 2009).

  14. Aarseth, E. in From Literature to Cultural Literacy (eds Segal, N. & Koleva, D.) 180–188 (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014).

  15. Gentner, D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7, 155–170 (1983).

    Google Scholar

  16. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J. & Jacobson, K. Origins of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 99, 605–632 (1992).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Allen, K. R., Smith, K. A. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29302–29310 (2020).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  18. Dubey, R., Agrawal, P., Pathak, D., Griffiths, T. L. & Efros, A. A. Investigating human priors for playing video games. PMLR 80, 1349–1357 (2018).

  19. Pouncy, T. & Gershman, S. J. Inductive biases in theory-based reinforcement learning. Cogn. Psychol. 138, 101509 (2022).

  20. Tsividis, P. A. et al. Human-level reinforcement learning through theory-based modeling, exploration, and planning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.12544 (2021).

  21. van Opheusden, B. et al. Expertise increases planning depth in human gameplay. Nature 618, 1000–1005 (2023).

  22. Coutrot, A. et al. Global determinants of navigation ability. Curr. Biol. 28, 2861–2866 (2018).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Wu, S. A. et al. Too many cooks: Bayesian inference for coordinating multi-agent collaboration. Top. Cogn. Sci. 13, 414–432 (2021).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Carroll, M. et al. On the utility of learning about humans for human–AI coordination. Proc. 33rd International Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (eds Wallach, H. M. et al.) 5174–5185 (Curran Associates, 2019).

  25. Kumar, A. A., Steyvers, M. & Balota, D. A. Semantic memory search and retrieval in a novel cooperative word game: a comparison of associative and distributional semantic models. Cogn. Sci. 45, e13053 (2021).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  26. McCarthy, W. P., Hawkins, R. D., Wang, H., Holdaway, C. & Fan, J. E. Learning to communicate about shared procedural abstractions. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.00077 (2021).

  27. Jun, E., Hsieh, G. & Reinecke, K. Types of motivation affect study selection, attention, and dropouts in online experiments. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 1, 1–15 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  28. Brändle, F., Binz, M. & Schulz, E. in The Drive for Knowledge: The Science of Human Information Seeking (eds. Cogliati Dezzi, I. et al.) 147–168 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  29. Leonard, J. A., Garcia, A. & Schulz, L. E. How adults’ actions, outcomes, and testimony affect preschoolers’ persistence. Child Dev. 91.4, 1254–1271 (2020).

  30. Chu, J. & Schulz, L. E. Play, curiosity, and cognition. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 2, 317–343 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  31. Murayama, K. A reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition: an integrated account of curiosity, interest, and intrinsic–extrinsic rewards. Psychol. Rev. 129, 175–198 (2022).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Kosoy, E. et al. Exploring exploration: comparing children with RL agents in unified environments. In Proceedings of "Bridging AI and Cognitive Science Workshop", (2020).

  33. Brändle, F., Stocks, L., Tenenbaum, J., Gershman, S. & Schulz, E. Empowerment contributes to exploration behaviour in a creative video game. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1481–1489 (2023).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Pedersen, M. K. et al. Measuring cognitive abilities in the wild: validating a population-scale game-based cognitive assessment. Cogn. Sci. 47, e13308 (2023).

  35. Hartshorne, J. K., de Leeuw, J. R., Goodman, N. D., Jennings, M. & O’Donnell, T. J. A thousand studies for the price of one: accelerating psychological science with Pushkin. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 1782–1803 (2019).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Thorne, H. T., Smith, J. J., Morgan, P. J., Babic, M. J. & Lubans, D. R. Video game genre preference, physical activity and screen-time in adolescent boys from low-income communities. J. Adolesc. 37, 1345–1352 (2014).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Jansz, J., Avis, C. & Vosmeer, M. Playing the Sims2: an exploration of gender differences in players’ motivations and patterns of play. N. Media Soc. 12, 235–251 (2010).

    Google Scholar

  38. Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Pinker, S. A critical period for second language acquisition: evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177, 263–277 (2018).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  39. Awad, E. et al. The moral machine experiment. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  40. Allen, K. R. et al. Lifelong learning of cognitive styles for physical problem-solving: the effect of embodied experience. Psychonomic Bull. Rev., https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02400-4 (2023).

  41. Ashmaig, O. et al. A platform for cognitive monitoring of neurosurgical patients during hospitalization. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 702 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  42. Andrews, G. Gameplay, gender, and socioeconomic status in two American high schools. E-Learn. Digit. Media 5, 199–213 (2008).

    Google Scholar

  43. Duggan, M. Gaming and Gamers (Pew Research Center, 2015).

  44. Chassy, P. & Gobet, F. Risk taking in adversarial situations: civilization differences in chess experts. Cognition 141, 36–40 (2015).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  45. Morsch, F. & Feist, M. Fritz v.12 (Chessbase, 2009).

  46. Holdaway, C. & Vul, E. Risk-taking in adversarial games: what can 1 billion online chess games tell us? Proc. Ann. Meeting Cogn. Sci. Soc. 43, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/403764rd (2021).

  47. Coutrot, A. et al. Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability. Nature 604, 104–110 (2022).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  48. Coughlan, G. et al. Toward personalized cognitive diagnostics of at-genetic-risk Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9285–9292 (2019).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  49. Chu, Y. & MacGregor, J. N. Human performance on insight problem solving: a review. J. Probl. Solving 3, 6 (2011).

    Google Scholar

  50. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. Analogical problem solving. Cogn. Psychol. 12, 306–355 (1980).

    Google Scholar

  51. de Groot, A. D. Het Denken van den Schaker: Een Experimenteel-Psychologische Studie (Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij,1946).

  52. Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. Perception in chess. Cogn. Psychol. 4, 55–81 (1973).

    Google Scholar

  53. Gobet, F. et al. Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 236–243 (2001).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  54. Stafford, T. & Dewar, M. Tracing the trajectory of skill learning with a very large sample of online game players. Psychol. Sci. 25, 511–518 (2014).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  55. Eisenberg, I. W. et al. Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. Nat. Commun. 10, 2319 (2019).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  56. Rafner, J. et al. Digital games for creativity assessment: strengths, weaknesses and opportunities. Creat. Res. J. 34, 28–54 (2022).

    Google Scholar

  57. Schulz, E., Bertram, L., Hofer, M. & Nelson, J. D. Exploring the space of human exploration using Entropy Mastermind. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/540666 (2019).

  58. Brown, H. R. et al. Crowdsourcing for cognitive science—the utility of smartphones. PLoS ONE 9, e100662 (2014).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  59. Griffiths, T. L. Manifesto for a new (computational) cognitive revolution. Cognition 135, 21–23 (2015).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  60. Almaatouq, A. et al. Scaling Up Experimental Social, Behavioral, and Economic Science (Computational Social Science Lab at the University of Pennsylvania, 2021).

  61. Cross, L., co*ckburn, J., Yue, Y. & O’Doherty, J. P. Using deep reinforcement learning to reveal how the brain encodes abstract state-space representations in high-dimensional environments. Neuron 109, 724–738 (2021).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  62. Peterson, J. C., Bourgin, D. D., Agrawal, M., Reichman, D. & Griffiths, T. L. Using large-scale experiments and machine learning to discover theories of human decision-making. Science 372, 1209–1214 (2021).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  63. Bongiorno, C. et al. Vector-based pedestrian navigation in cities. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 678–685 (2021).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  64. Sullivan, J., Mei, M., Perfors, A., Wojcik, E. & Frank, M. C. SAYCam: a large, longitudinal audiovisual dataset recorded from the infant’s perspective. Open Mind 5, 20–29 (2021).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  65. Rafferty, A. N., Zaharia, M. & Griffiths, T. L. Optimally designing games for behavioural research. Proc. R. Soc. A 470, 20130828 (2014).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  66. Pymunk v.6.6.0, https://pymunk.org (Victor Blomqvist, 2023).

  67. Juliani, A. et al. Unity: a general platform for intelligent agents. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.02627 (2020).

  68. Mazarakis, A. & Bräuer, P. Gamification is working, but which one exactly? Results from an experiment with four game design elements. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 39, 612–627 (2023).

    Google Scholar

  69. Hodges, N. How to gamify cognitive tasks to increase participant engagement.YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TBllI4t3v4&t=2s (Sage, 2023).

  70. Silvertown, J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 467–471 (2009).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  71. van Opheusden, B., Acerbi, L. & Ma, W. J. Unbiased and efficient log-likelihood estimation with inverse binomial sampling. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008483 (2020).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  72. Acerbi, L. & Ma, W. J. Practical Bayesian optimization for model fitting with Bayesian adaptive direct search. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).

  73. Gravetter, F. J. & Forzano, L.-A. B. Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences 4th edn (Wadsworth, 2012).

  74. Lewkowicz, D. J. The concept of ecological validity: what are its limitations and is it bad to be invalid? Infancy 2, 437–450 (2001).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  75. Lickliter, R. & Bahrick, L. E. The salience of multimodal sensory stimulation in early development: implications for the issue of ecological validity. Infancy 2, 451–467 (2001).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  76. Yang, Q. et al. Monkey plays Pac-Man with compositional strategies and hierarchical decision-making. eLife 11, e74500 (2022).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  77. Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P. & Dolan, R. J. Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron 69, 1204–1215 (2011).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  78. Kirchner, W. K. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J. Exp. Psychol. 55, 352–358 (1958).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  79. Gershman, S. J. Uncertainty and exploration. Decision 6, 277–286 (2019).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  80. Shallice, T. Specific impairments of planning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 298, 199–209 (1982).

    CAS Google Scholar

  81. Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V. P. & Broseta, B. Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: an experimental study. Econometrica 69, 1193–1235 (2001).

    Google Scholar

  82. Schaul, T. A video game description language for model-based or interactive learning. In 2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG) 1–8 (IEEE, 2013).

Download references

Using games to understand the mind (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Last Updated:

Views: 5430

Rating: 5 / 5 (70 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Birthday: 1998-01-29

Address: Apt. 611 3357 Yong Plain, West Audra, IL 70053

Phone: +5819954278378

Job: Construction Director

Hobby: Embroidery, Creative writing, Shopping, Driving, Stand-up comedy, Coffee roasting, Scrapbooking

Introduction: My name is Dr. Pierre Goyette, I am a enchanting, powerful, jolly, rich, graceful, colorful, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.